Bluetooth: Classic: Fix invalid comparison with int8_t
We can't use 0xff to compare with an int8_t since it'll trigger compiler
warnings/errors:
subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/br.c:397:11: error: result of comparison of
constant 255 with expression of type 'int8_t' (aka 'signed char') is
always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if (rssi == 0xff) {
~~ ^ ~~
1 error generated.
Use 127 instead for situations where we don't know the RSSI value, like
when processing remote name events. This is fine since from a spec
perspective only -127 - +20 are valid values for the parameter.
Signed-off-by:
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@silabs.com>
Loading
Please sign in to comment