sched: Properly account for timeslicing in tickless mode
When adding a new runnable thread in tickless mode, we need to detect
whether it will timeslice with the running thread and reset the timer,
otherwise it won't get any CPU time until the next interrupt fires at
some indeterminate time in the future.
This fixes the specific bug discussed in #7193, but the broader
problem of tickless and timeslicing interacting badly remains. The
code as it exists needs some rework to avoid all the #ifdef mess.
Signed-off-by:
Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
Loading
Please sign in to comment