Commit fc32490b authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Daniel Borkmann
Browse files

selftests/bpf: Fix test_progs's parsing of test numbers



When specifying disjoint set of tests, test_progs doesn't set skipped test's
array elements to false. This leads to spurious execution of tests that should
have been skipped. Fix it by explicitly initializing them to false.

Fixes: 3a516a0a ("selftests/bpf: add sub-tests support for test_progs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314013932.4035712-2-andriin@fb.com
parent 94c2f50b
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+7 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ err:

int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
{
	int i, set_len = 0, num, start = 0, end = -1;
	int i, set_len = 0, new_len, num, start = 0, end = -1;
	bool *set = NULL, *tmp, parsing_end = false;
	char *next;

@@ -459,20 +459,21 @@ int parse_num_list(const char *s, struct test_selector *sel)
			return -EINVAL;

		if (end + 1 > set_len) {
			set_len = end + 1;
			tmp = realloc(set, set_len);
			new_len = end + 1;
			tmp = realloc(set, new_len);
			if (!tmp) {
				free(set);
				return -ENOMEM;
			}
			for (i = set_len; i < start; i++)
				tmp[i] = false;
			set = tmp;
			set_len = new_len;
		}
		for (i = start; i <= end; i++) {
		for (i = start; i <= end; i++)
			set[i] = true;
	}

	}

	if (!set)
		return -EINVAL;