+1
−10
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
The hardware folks told me that for page clearing "when you exactly
know what to do, hand written xc+pfd is usally faster then mvcl for
page clearing, as it saves millicode overhead and parameter parsing
and checking" as long as you dont need the cache bypassing.
Turns out that gcc already does a proper xc,pfd loop.
A small test on z196 that does
buff = mmap(NULL, bufsize,PROT_EXEC|PROT_WRITE|PROT_READ,AP_PRIVATE| MAP_ANONYMOUS,0,0);
for ( i = 0; i < bufsize; i+= 256)
buff[i] = 0x5;
gets 20% faster (touches every cache line of a page)
and
buff = mmap(NULL, bufsize,PROT_EXEC|PROT_WRITE|PROT_READ,AP_PRIVATE| MAP_ANONYMOUS,0,0);
for ( i = 0; i < bufsize; i+= 4096)
buff[i] = 0x5;
is within noise ratio (touches one cache line of a page).
As the clear_page is usually called for first memory accesses
we can assume that at least one cache line is used afterwards,
so this change should be always better.
Another benchmark, a make -j 40 of my testsuite in tmpfs with
hot caches on a 32cpu system:
-- unpatched -- -- patched --
real 0m1.017s real 0m0.994s (~2% faster, but in noise)
user 0m5.339s user 0m5.016s (~6% faster)
sys 0m0.691s sys 0m0.632s (~8% faster)
Let use the same define to memset as the asm-generic variant
Signed-off-by:
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE