Commit f2286ab9 authored by Mauro Carvalho Chehab's avatar Mauro Carvalho Chehab Committed by Paul E. McKenney
Browse files

docs: RCU: Convert stallwarn.txt to ReST



- Add a SPDX header;
- Adjust document and section titles;
- Fix list markups;
- Some whitespace fixes and new line breaks;
- Mark literal blocks as such;
- Add it to RCU/index.rst.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
parent 90c73cb2
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ RCU concepts
   rculist_nulls
   rcuref
   torture
   stallwarn
   listRCU
   NMI-RCU
   UP
+34 −21
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

==============================
Using RCU's CPU Stall Detector
==============================

This document first discusses what sorts of issues RCU's CPU stall
detector can locate, and then discusses kernel parameters and Kconfig
@@ -7,39 +11,40 @@ this document explains the stall detector's "splat" format.


What Causes RCU CPU Stall Warnings?
===================================

So your kernel printed an RCU CPU stall warning.  The next question is
"What caused it?"  The following problems can result in RCU CPU stall
warnings:

o	A CPU looping in an RCU read-side critical section.
-	A CPU looping in an RCU read-side critical section.

o	A CPU looping with interrupts disabled.
-	A CPU looping with interrupts disabled.

o	A CPU looping with preemption disabled.
-	A CPU looping with preemption disabled.

o	A CPU looping with bottom halves disabled.
-	A CPU looping with bottom halves disabled.

o	For !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels, a CPU looping anywhere in the kernel
-	For !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels, a CPU looping anywhere in the kernel
	without invoking schedule().  If the looping in the kernel is
	really expected and desirable behavior, you might need to add
	some calls to cond_resched().

o	Booting Linux using a console connection that is too slow to
-	Booting Linux using a console connection that is too slow to
	keep up with the boot-time console-message rate.  For example,
	a 115Kbaud serial console can be -way- too slow to keep up
	with boot-time message rates, and will frequently result in
	RCU CPU stall warning messages.  Especially if you have added
	debug printk()s.

o	Anything that prevents RCU's grace-period kthreads from running.
-	Anything that prevents RCU's grace-period kthreads from running.
	This can result in the "All QSes seen" console-log message.
	This message will include information on when the kthread last
	ran and how often it should be expected to run.  It can also
	result in the "rcu_.*kthread starved for" console-log message,
	result in the ``rcu_.*kthread starved for`` console-log message,
	which will include additional debugging information.

o	A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel, which might
-	A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel, which might
	happen to preempt a low-priority task in the middle of an RCU
	read-side critical section.   This is especially damaging if
	that low-priority task is not permitted to run on any other CPU,
@@ -48,7 +53,7 @@ o A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel, which might
	While the system is in the process of running itself out of
	memory, you might see stall-warning messages.

o	A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT kernel that
-	A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT kernel that
	is running at a higher priority than the RCU softirq threads.
	This will prevent RCU callbacks from ever being invoked,
	and in a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU kernel will further prevent
@@ -63,7 +68,7 @@ o A CPU-bound real-time task in a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT kernel that
	can increase your system's context-switch rate and thus degrade
	performance.

o	A periodic interrupt whose handler takes longer than the time
-	A periodic interrupt whose handler takes longer than the time
	interval between successive pairs of interrupts.  This can
	prevent RCU's kthreads and softirq handlers from running.
	Note that certain high-overhead debugging options, for example
@@ -71,20 +76,20 @@ o A periodic interrupt whose handler takes longer than the time
	considerably longer than normal, which can in turn result in
	RCU CPU stall warnings.

o	Testing a workload on a fast system, tuning the stall-warning
-	Testing a workload on a fast system, tuning the stall-warning
	timeout down to just barely avoid RCU CPU stall warnings, and then
	running the same workload with the same stall-warning timeout on a
	slow system.  Note that thermal throttling and on-demand governors
	can cause a single system to be sometimes fast and sometimes slow!

o	A hardware or software issue shuts off the scheduler-clock
-	A hardware or software issue shuts off the scheduler-clock
	interrupt on a CPU that is not in dyntick-idle mode.  This
	problem really has happened, and seems to be most likely to
	result in RCU CPU stall warnings for CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=n kernels.

o	A bug in the RCU implementation.
-	A bug in the RCU implementation.

o	A hardware failure.  This is quite unlikely, but has occurred
-	A hardware failure.  This is quite unlikely, but has occurred
	at least once in real life.  A CPU failed in a running system,
	becoming unresponsive, but not causing an immediate crash.
	This resulted in a series of RCU CPU stall warnings, eventually
@@ -109,6 +114,7 @@ see include/trace/events/rcu.h.


Fine-Tuning the RCU CPU Stall Detector
======================================

The rcuupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_suppress module parameter disables RCU's
CPU stall detector, which detects conditions that unduly delay RCU grace
@@ -118,6 +124,7 @@ The stall detector's idea of what constitutes "unduly delayed" is
controlled by a set of kernel configuration variables and cpp macros:

CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
----------------------------

	This kernel configuration parameter defines the period of time
	that RCU will wait from the beginning of a grace period until it
@@ -137,6 +144,7 @@ CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
	/sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_suppress.

RCU_STALL_DELAY_DELTA
---------------------

	Although the lockdep facility is extremely useful, it does add
	some overhead.  Therefore, under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, the
@@ -145,6 +153,7 @@ RCU_STALL_DELAY_DELTA
	macro, not a kernel configuration parameter.)

RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY
-------------------

	The CPU stall detector tries to make the offending CPU print its
	own warnings, as this often gives better-quality stack traces.
@@ -155,6 +164,7 @@ RCU_STALL_RAT_DELAY
	parameter.)

rcupdate.rcu_task_stall_timeout
-------------------------------

	This boot/sysfs parameter controls the RCU-tasks stall warning
	interval.  A value of zero or less suppresses RCU-tasks stall
@@ -168,9 +178,10 @@ rcupdate.rcu_task_stall_timeout


Interpreting RCU's CPU Stall-Detector "Splats"
==============================================

For non-RCU-tasks flavors of RCU, when a CPU detects that it is stalling,
it will print a message similar to the following:
it will print a message similar to the following::

	INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
	2-...: (3 GPs behind) idle=06c/0/0 softirq=1453/1455 fqs=0
@@ -223,7 +234,7 @@ an estimate of the total number of RCU callbacks queued across all CPUs
(625 in this case).

In kernels with CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, more information is printed
for each CPU:
for each CPU::

	0: (64628 ticks this GP) idle=dd5/3fffffffffffffff/0 softirq=82/543 last_accelerate: a345/d342 dyntick_enabled: 1

@@ -235,7 +246,7 @@ processing is enabled.

If the grace period ends just as the stall warning starts printing,
there will be a spurious stall-warning message, which will include
the following:
the following::

	INFO: Stall ended before state dump start

@@ -248,7 +259,7 @@ which is overkill for this sort of problem.

If all CPUs and tasks have passed through quiescent states, but the
grace period has nevertheless failed to end, the stall-warning splat
will include something like the following:
will include something like the following::

	All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 23807 (4297905177-4297881370), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0

@@ -261,7 +272,7 @@ which is way less than 23807. Finally, the root rcu_node structure's

If the relevant grace-period kthread has been unable to run prior to
the stall warning, as was the case in the "All QSes seen" line above,
the following additional line is printed:
the following additional line is printed::

	kthread starved for 23807 jiffies! g7075 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(3) ->state=0x1 ->cpu=5

@@ -276,6 +287,7 @@ kthread last ran on CPU 5.


Multiple Warnings From One Stall
================================

If a stall lasts long enough, multiple stall-warning messages will be
printed for it.  The second and subsequent messages are printed at
@@ -285,9 +297,10 @@ of the stall and the first message.


Stall Warnings for Expedited Grace Periods
==========================================

If an expedited grace period detects a stall, it will place a message
like the following in dmesg:
like the following in dmesg::

	INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 7-... } 21119 jiffies s: 73 root: 0x2/.

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq, unsigned long gps)

	/*
	 * OK, time to rat on our buddy...
	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt for info on how to debug
	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst for info on how to debug
	 * RCU CPU stall warnings.
	 */
	pr_err("INFO: %s detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:\n", rcu_state.name);
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void print_cpu_stall(unsigned long gps)

	/*
	 * OK, time to rat on ourselves...
	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt for info on how to debug
	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst for info on how to debug
	 * RCU CPU stall warnings.
	 */
	pr_err("INFO: %s self-detected stall on CPU\n", rcu_state.name);