Commit f20fda48 authored by Matti Linnanvuori's avatar Matti Linnanvuori Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

Mutex documentation is unclear about software interrupts, tasklets and timers



Acked-by: default avatarArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 1019f96d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ of advantages of mutexes:
   * - task may not exit with mutex held
   * - memory areas where held locks reside must not be freed
   * - held mutexes must not be reinitialized
   * - mutexes may not be used in irq contexts
   * - mutexes may not be used in hardware or software interrupt
   *   contexts such as tasklets and timers

   furthermore, there are also convenience features in the debugging
   code:
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
 * - task may not exit with mutex held
 * - memory areas where held locks reside must not be freed
 * - held mutexes must not be reinitialized
 * - mutexes may not be used in irq contexts
 * - mutexes may not be used in hardware or software interrupt
 *   contexts such as tasklets and timers
 *
 * These semantics are fully enforced when DEBUG_MUTEXES is
 * enabled. Furthermore, besides enforcing the above rules, the mutex