+5
−2
+17
−17
+5
−5
+12
−3
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Kazuya Mio reported that he was able to hit BUG_ON(next == lblock) in ext4_ext_put_gap_in_cache() while creating a sparse file in extent format and fill the tail of file up to its end. We will hit the BUG_ON when we write the last block (2^32-1) into the sparse file. The root cause of the problem lies in the fact that we specifically set s_maxbytes so that block at s_maxbytes fit into on-disk extent format, which is 32 bit long. However, we are not storing start and end block number, but rather start block number and length in blocks. It means that in order to cover extent from 0 to EXT_MAX_BLOCK we need EXT_MAX_BLOCK+1 to fit into len (because we counting block 0 as well) - and it does not. The only way to fix it without changing the meaning of the struct ext4_extent members is, as Kazuya Mio suggested, to lower s_maxbytes by one fs block so we can cover the whole extent we can get by the on-disk extent format. Also in many places EXT_MAX_BLOCK is used as length instead of maximum logical block number as the name suggests, it is all a bit messy. So this commit renames it to EXT_MAX_BLOCKS and change its usage in some places to actually be maximum number of blocks in the extent. The bug which this commit fixes can be reproduced as follows: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=<blocksize> count=1 seek=$((2**32-2)) sync dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/mp1/file bs=<blocksize> count=1 seek=$((2**32-1)) Reported-by:Kazuya Mio <k-mio@sx.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by:
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE