+10
−19
+5
−7
+8
−14
+7
−10
+6
−21
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
It seems to me that commit ab5f5e8b "[XFRM]: xfrm audit calls" is doing something strange at xfrm_audit_helper_usrinfo(). If secid != 0 && security_secid_to_secctx(secid) != 0, the caller calls audit_log_task_context() which basically does secid != 0 && security_secid_to_secctx(secid) == 0 case except that secid is obtained from current thread's context. Oh, what happens if secid passed to xfrm_audit_helper_usrinfo() was obtained from other thread's context? It might audit current thread's context rather than other thread's context if security_secid_to_secctx() in xfrm_audit_helper_usrinfo() failed for some reason. Then, are all the caller of xfrm_audit_helper_usrinfo() passing either secid obtained from current thread's context or secid == 0? It seems to me that they are. If I didn't miss something, we don't need to pass secid to xfrm_audit_helper_usrinfo() because audit_log_task_context() will obtain secid from current thread's context. Signed-off-by:Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by:
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE