Commit ef227c39 authored by Drew DeVault's avatar Drew DeVault Committed by Jonathan Corbet
Browse files

submitting-patches.rst: remove heading numbering



This follows similar changes throughout Documentation; these numbers
tend to get outdated and are not especially useful.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDrew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903160545.83185-2-sir@cmpwn.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
parent 7c8b9e30
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+34 −34
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ of the mechanical work done for you, though you'll still need to prepare
and document a sensible set of patches.  In general, use of ``git`` will make
your life as a kernel developer easier.

0) Obtain a current source tree
-------------------------------
Obtain a current source tree
----------------------------

If you do not have a repository with the current kernel source handy, use
``git`` to obtain one.  You'll want to start with the mainline repository,
@@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ is another popular alternative.

.. _describe_changes:

2) Describe your changes
------------------------
Describe your changes
---------------------

Describe your problem.  Whether your patch is a one-line bug fix or
5000 lines of a new feature, there must be an underlying problem that
@@ -203,8 +203,8 @@ An example call::

.. _split_changes:

3) Separate your changes
------------------------
Separate your changes
---------------------

Separate each **logical change** into a separate patch.

@@ -236,8 +236,8 @@ then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration.



4) Style-check your changes
---------------------------
Style-check your changes
------------------------

Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
found in
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ You should be able to justify all violations that remain in your
patch.


5) Select the recipients for your patch
---------------------------------------
Select the recipients for your patch
------------------------------------

You should always copy the appropriate subsystem maintainer(s) on any patch
to code that they maintain; look through the MAINTAINERS file and the
@@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:



6) No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Linus and other kernel developers need to be able to read and comment
on the changes you are submitting.  It is important for a kernel
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ See :ref:`Documentation/process/email-clients.rst <email_clients>`
for hints about configuring your e-mail client so that it sends your patches
untouched.

7) E-mail size
--------------
E-mail size
-----------

Large changes are not appropriate for mailing lists, and some
maintainers.  If your patch, uncompressed, exceeds 300 kB in size,
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ server, and provide instead a URL (link) pointing to your patch. But note
that if your patch exceeds 300 kB, it almost certainly needs to be broken up
anyway.

8) Respond to review comments
-----------------------------
Respond to review comments
--------------------------

Your patch will almost certainly get comments from reviewers on ways in
which the patch can be improved.  You must respond to those comments;
@@ -397,8 +397,8 @@ reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond
politely and address the problems they have pointed out.


9) Don't get discouraged - or impatient
---------------------------------------
Don't get discouraged - or impatient
------------------------------------

After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
@@ -411,8 +411,8 @@ one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
busy times like merge windows.


10) Include PATCH in the subject
--------------------------------
Include PATCH in the subject
-----------------------------

Due to high e-mail traffic to Linus, and to linux-kernel, it is common
convention to prefix your subject line with [PATCH].  This lets Linus
@@ -421,8 +421,8 @@ e-mail discussions.



11) Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin
----------------------------------------------------------
Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin
------------------------------------------------------

To improve tracking of who did what, especially with patches that can
percolate to their final resting place in the kernel through several
@@ -518,8 +518,8 @@ tracking your trees, and to people trying to troubleshoot bugs in your
tree.


12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:
-------------------------------------------------------
When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:
------------------------------------------------

The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path.
@@ -587,8 +587,8 @@ Example of a patch submitted by a Co-developed-by: author::
	Signed-off-by: Submitting Co-Author <sub@coauthor.example.org>


13) Using Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Reported-by:, Tested-by:, Reviewed-by:, Suggested-by: and Fixes:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Reported-by tag gives credit to people who find bugs and report them and it
hopefully inspires them to help us again in the future.  Please note that if
@@ -651,8 +651,8 @@ for more details.

.. _the_canonical_patch_format:

14) The canonical patch format
------------------------------
The canonical patch format
--------------------------

This section describes how the patch itself should be formatted.  Note
that, if you have your patches stored in a ``git`` repository, proper patch
@@ -774,8 +774,8 @@ references.

.. _explicit_in_reply_to:

15) Explicit In-Reply-To headers
--------------------------------
Explicit In-Reply-To headers
----------------------------

It can be helpful to manually add In-Reply-To: headers to a patch
(e.g., when using ``git send-email``) to associate the patch with
@@ -788,8 +788,8 @@ helpful, you can use the https://lkml.kernel.org/ redirector (e.g., in
the cover email text) to link to an earlier version of the patch series.


16) Providing base tree information
-----------------------------------
Providing base tree information
-------------------------------

When other developers receive your patches and start the review process,
it is often useful for them to know where in the tree history they
@@ -839,8 +839,8 @@ either below the ``---`` line or at the very bottom of all other
content, right before your email signature.


17) Sending ``git pull`` requests
---------------------------------
Sending ``git pull`` requests
-----------------------------

If you have a series of patches, it may be most convenient to have the
maintainer pull them directly into the subsystem repository with a