+2
−2
+0
−3
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS, that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and that limit was carried over to eBPF. When recently testing digest, I noticed that it's actually not possible to feed 4096 instructions via bpf(2). The check for > BPF_MAXINSNS was added back then to bpf_check() in cbd35700 ("bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log)"). However, 09756af4 ("bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload") added yet another check that comes before that into bpf_prog_load(), but this time bails out already in case of >= BPF_MAXINSNS. Fix it up and perform the check early in bpf_prog_load(), so we can drop the second one in bpf_check(). It makes sense, because also a 0 insn program is useless and we don't want to waste any resources doing work up to bpf_check() point. The existing bpf(2) man page documents E2BIG as the official error for such cases, so just stick with it as well. Fixes: 09756af4 ("bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload") Signed-off-by:Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by:
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE