+52
−9
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
All references from the block of SHARED_DATA_REF belong to that shared
block backref.
For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize 95
extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5
extent data backref root 258 objectid 265 offset 0 count 9
shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10
Block 394985472 might be leaf from root 257, and the item obejctid and
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) in that leaf just happens to be
260 and 65536 which is equal to the first extent data backref entry.
Before this patch, when we resolve backref:
root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536
we will add those refs in block 394985472 and wrongly treat those as the
refs we want.
Fix this by checking if the leaf we are processing is shared data
backref, if so, just skip this leaf.
Shared data refs added into preftrees.direct have all entry value = 0
(root_id = 0, key = NULL, level = 0) except parent entry.
Other refs from indirect tree will have key value and root id != 0, and
these values won't be changed when their parent is resolved and added to
preftrees.direct. Therefore, we could reuse the preftrees.direct and
search ref with all values = 0 except parent is set to avoid getting
those resolved refs block.
Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by:
ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE