+11
−39
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
In commit f1befe71 Chris Wilson added some code to clear the full gtt on g33/pineview instead of just the mappable part. The code looks like it was copy-pasted from agp/intel-gtt.c, at least an identical piece of code is still there (in intel_i830_init_gtt_entries). This lead to a regression in 2.6.35 which was supposedly fixed in commit e7b96f28 Now this commit makes absolutely no sense to me. It seems to be slightly confused about chipset generations - it references docs for 4th gen but the regression concerns 3rd gen g33. Luckily the the g33 gmch docs are available with the GMCH Graphics Control pci config register definitions. The other (bigger problem) is that the new check in there uses the i830 stolen mem bits (.5M, 1M or 8M of stolen mem). They are different since the i855GM. The most likely case is that it hits the 512M fallback, which was probably the right thing for the boxes this was tested on. So the original approach by Chris Wilson seems to be wrong and the current code is definitely wrong. There is a third approach by Jesse Barnes from his RFC patch "Who wants a bigger GTT mapping range?" where he simply shoves g33 in the same clause like later chipset generations. I've asked him and Jesse confirmed that this should work. So implement it. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16891$ Tested-by:Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE