+17
−0
+2
−0
+1
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
When a CPU is offlined all interrupts that have an action are migrated to other still online CPUs. However, if the interrupt has chained handler installed this is not done. Chained handlers are used by GPIO drivers which support interrupts, for instance. When the affinity is not corrected properly we end up in situation where most interrupts are not arriving to the online CPUs anymore. For example on Intel Braswell system which has SD-card card detection signal connected to a GPIO the IO-APIC routing entries look like below after CPU1 is offlined: pin30, enabled , level, low , V(52), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1) pin31, enabled , level, low , V(42), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1) pin32, enabled , level, low , V(62), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1) pin5b, enabled , level, low , V(72), IRR(0), S(0), logical , D(03), M(1) The problem here is that the destination mask still contains both CPUs even if CPU1 is already offline. This means that the IO-APIC still routes interrupts to the other CPU as well. We solve the problem by providing a default action for chained interrupts. This action allows the migration code to correct affinity (as it finds desc->action != NULL). Also make the default action handler to emit a warning if for some reason a chained handler ends up calling it. Signed-off-by:Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444039935-30475-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE