+53
−77
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
This reverts commit 870190a9. It was not a good idea. The custom hash table was a much better fit for this purpose. A fast lookup is not essential, in fact for most cases there is no lookup at all because original tuple is not taken and can be used as-is. What needs to be fast is insertion and deletion. rhlist removal however requires a rhlist walk. We can have thousands of entries in such a list if source port/addresses are reused for multiple flows, if this happens removal requests are so expensive that deletions of a few thousand flows can take several seconds(!). The advantages that we got from rhashtable are: 1) table auto-sizing 2) multiple locks 1) would be nice to have, but it is not essential as we have at most one lookup per new flow, so even a million flows in the bysource table are not a problem compared to current deletion cost. 2) is easy to add to custom hash table. I tried to add hlist_node to rhlist to speed up rhltable_remove but this isn't doable without changing semantics. rhltable_remove_fast will check that the to-be-deleted object is part of the table and that requires a list walk that we want to avoid. Furthermore, using hlist_node increases size of struct rhlist_head, which in turn increases nf_conn size. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196821 Reported-by:Ivan Babrou <ibobrik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by:
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE