+79
−67
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
This is a purely mechanical split of the copy_one_pte() function. It's
not immediately obvious when looking at the diff because of the
indentation change, but the way to see what is going on in this commit
is to use the "-w" flag to not show pure whitespace changes, and you see
how the first part of copy_one_pte() is simply lifted out into a
separate function.
And since the non-present case is marked unlikely, don't make the new
function be inlined. Not that gcc really seems to care, since it looks
like it will inline it anyway due to the whole "single callsite for
static function" logic. In fact, code generation with the function
split is almost identical to before. But not marking it inline is the
right thing to do.
This is pure prep-work and cleanup for subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE