staging: kpc2000: declare two functions as static. (dbaca02b) · Commits · 戴 / test

Two functions were not used outside the translation-unit in which they were defined. Declared them static. Fixes two sparse warnings: drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:98:5: warning: symbol 'probe_core_basic' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c:288:5: warning: symbol 'probe_core_uio' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by:

Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> Reviewed-by:

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/cell_probe.c

+4 −2

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ void parse_core_table_entry(struct core_table_entry *cte, const u64 read_val, co
		}


		int probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device pcard, char name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
		static int probe_core_basic(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard,
		char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
		{
		struct mfd_cell cell = {0};
		struct resource resources[2];
		@@ -257,7 +258,8 @@ int kuio_irqcontrol(struct uio_info *uioinfo, s32 irq_on)
		return 0;
		}

		int probe_core_uio(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device pcard, char name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
		static int probe_core_uio(unsigned int core_num, struct kp2000_device *pcard,
		char *name, const struct core_table_entry cte)
		{
		struct kpc_uio_device *kudev;
		int rv;

Admin message