+29
−29
+1
−0
+1
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
In e9964c10 we change cap flushing to do a delicate dance because some inodes on the cap_dirty list could be in a migrating state (got EXPORT but not IMPORT) in which we couldn't actually flush and move from dirty->flushing, breaking the while (!empty) { process first } loop structure. It worked for a single sync thread, but was not reentrant and triggered infinite loops when multiple syncers came along. Instead, move inodes with dirty to a separate cap_dirty_migrating list when in the limbo export-but-no-import state, allowing us to go back to the simple loop structure (which was reentrant). This is cleaner and more robust. Audited the cap_dirty users and this looks fine: list_empty(&ci->i_dirty_item) is still a reliable indicator of whether we have dirty caps (which list we're on is irrelevant) and list_del_init() calls still do the right thing. Signed-off-by:Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE