+2
−8
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Somehow we ended up with duplicate hub feature #defines in ch11.h. Tatyana Brokhman first created the USB 3.0 hub feature macros in 2.6.38 with commit 0eadcc09 "usb: USB3.0 ch11 definitions". In 2.6.39, I modified a patch from John Youn that added similar macros in a different place in the same file, and committed dbe79bbe "USB 3.0 Hub Changes". Some of the #defines used different names for the same values. Others used exactly the same names with the same values, like these gems: #define USB_PORT_FEAT_BH_PORT_RESET 28 ... #define USB_PORT_FEAT_BH_PORT_RESET 28 According to my very geeky husband (who looked it up in the C99 spec), it is allowed to have object-like macros with duplicate names as long as the replacement list is exactly the same. However, he recalled that some compilers will give warnings when they find duplicate macros. It's probably best to remove the duplicates in the stable tree, so that the code compiles for everyone. The macros are now fixed to move the feature requests that are specific to USB 3.0 hubs into a new section (out of the USB 2.0 hub feature section), and use the most common macro name. This patch should be backported to 2.6.39. Signed-off-by:Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tatyana Brokhman <tlinder@codeaurora.org> Cc: John Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com> Cc: Jamey Sharp <jamey@minilop.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE