+1
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Initialize the preempt notifier immediately in kvm_vcpu_init() to pave
the way for removing kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(), i.e. to allow arch specific
code to call vcpu_load() during kvm_arch_vcpu_create().
Back when preemption support was added, the location of the call to init
the preempt notifier was perfectly sane. The overall vCPU creation flow
featured a single arch specific hook and the preempt notifer was used
immediately after its initialization (by vcpu_load()). E.g.:
vcpu = kvm_arch_ops->vcpu_create(kvm, n);
if (IS_ERR(vcpu))
return PTR_ERR(vcpu);
preempt_notifier_init(&vcpu->preempt_notifier, &kvm_preempt_ops);
vcpu_load(vcpu);
r = kvm_mmu_setup(vcpu);
vcpu_put(vcpu);
if (r < 0)
goto free_vcpu;
Today, the call to preempt_notifier_init() is sandwiched between two
arch specific calls, kvm_arch_vcpu_create() and kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(),
which needlessly forces x86 (and possibly others?) to split its vCPU
creation flow. Init the preempt notifier prior to any arch specific
call so that each arch can independently decide how best to organize
its creation flow.
Acked-by:
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by:
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by:
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE