Commit ca71df31 authored by Tang Junhui's avatar Tang Junhui Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

bcache: fix using of loop variable in memory shrink



In bch_mca_scan(), There are some confusion and logical error in the use of
loop variables. In this patch, we clarify them as:
1) nr: the number of btree nodes needs to scan, which will decrease after
we scan a btree node, and should not be less than 0;
2) i: the number of btree nodes have scanned, includes both
btree_cache_freeable and btree_cache, which should not be bigger than
btree_cache_used;
3) freed: the number of btree nodes have freed.

Signed-off-by: default avatarTang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent f3641c3a
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+6 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -665,6 +665,7 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
	struct btree *b, *t;
	unsigned long i, nr = sc->nr_to_scan;
	unsigned long freed = 0;
	unsigned int btree_cache_used;

	if (c->shrinker_disabled)
		return SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -689,9 +690,10 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
	nr = min_t(unsigned long, nr, mca_can_free(c));

	i = 0;
	btree_cache_used = c->btree_cache_used;
	list_for_each_entry_safe(b, t, &c->btree_cache_freeable, list) {
		if (freed >= nr)
			break;
		if (nr <= 0)
			goto out;

		if (++i > 3 &&
		    !mca_reap(b, 0, false)) {
@@ -699,9 +701,10 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
			rw_unlock(true, b);
			freed++;
		}
		nr--;
	}

	for (i = 0; (nr--) && i < c->btree_cache_used; i++) {
	for (;  (nr--) && i < btree_cache_used; i++) {
		if (list_empty(&c->btree_cache))
			goto out;