+1
−0
+18
−38
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Waiting for activity on the "clean_list" to quiesce is no substitute for proper locking. We can have multiple threads competing for "llist_del_first" via "rds_ib_reuse_mr", and a single thread competing for "llist_del_all" and "llist_del_first" via "rds_ib_flush_mr_pool". Since "llist_del_first" depends on "list->first->next" not to change in the midst of the operation, simply waiting for all current calls to "rds_ib_reuse_mr" to quiesce across all CPUs is woefully inadequate: By the time "wait_clean_list_grace" is done iterating over all CPUs to see that there is no concurrent caller to "rds_ib_reuse_mr", a new caller may have just shown up on the first CPU. Furthermore, <linux/llist.h> explicitly calls out the need for locking: * Cases where locking is needed: * If we have multiple consumers with llist_del_first used in one consumer, * and llist_del_first or llist_del_all used in other consumers, * then a lock is needed. Also, while at it, drop the unused "pool" parameter from "list_to_llist_nodes". Signed-off-by:Gerd Rausch <gerd.rausch@oracle.com> Acked-by:
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE