+4
−4
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
In 65f63384 "xen: improve error handling in do_suspend" I said: - xs_suspend()/xs_resume() and dpm_suspend_noirq()/dpm_resume_noirq() were not nested in the obvious way. and changed the ordering of the calls as so: BEFORE AFTER xs_suspend dpm_suspend_noirq dpm_suspend_noirq xs_suspend *SUSPEND* *SUSPEND* dpm_resume_noirq dpm_resume_noirq xs_resume xs_resume Clearly this is not an improvement and I was talking rubbish. In particular the new ordering is susceptible to a hang if a xenstore write is in progress at the point at which the suspend kicks in. When the suspend process calls xs_suspend it tries to take the request_mutex but if a write is in progress it could be looping in xenbus_xs.c:read_reply() waiting for something to arrive on &xs_state.reply_list while holding the request_mutex (taken in the caller of read_reply). However if we have done dpm_suspend_noirq before xs_suspend then we won't get any more xenstore interrupts and process_msg() will never be woken up to add anything to the reply_list. Fix this by calling xs_suspend before dpm_suspend_noirq. If dpm_suspend_noirq fails then make sure we go through the xs_suspend_cancel() code path. Signed-off-by:Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Acked-by:
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Stable Kernel <stable@kernel.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE