+196
−9
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
/proc/$PID/cmdline truncates output at PAGE_SIZE. It is easy to see with $ cat /proc/self/cmdline $(seq 1037) 2>/dev/null However, command line size was never limited to PAGE_SIZE but to 128 KB and relatively recently limitation was removed altogether. People noticed and ask questions: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/199130/how-do-i-increase-the-proc-pid-cmdline-4096-byte-limit seq file interface is not OK, because it kmalloc's for whole output and open + read(, 1) + sleep will pin arbitrary amounts of kernel memory. To not do that, limit must be imposed which is incompatible with arbitrary sized command lines. I apologize for hairy code, but this it direct consequence of command line layout in memory and hacks to support things like "init [3]". The loops are "unrolled" otherwise it is either macros which hide control flow or functions with 7-8 arguments with equal line count. There should be real setproctitle(2) or something. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a billion min() warnings] Signed-off-by:Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE