+10
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Commit cea443a8 ("i2c: Support i2c_transfer in atomic contexts") added in_atomic() to the I2C core. However, the use of in_atomic() outside of core kernel code is discouraged and was already[1] when this code was added in early 2008. The above commit was a preparation for commit b7a36701 ("i2c-pxa: Add polling transfer"). Its commit message says explicitly it was added "for cases where I2C transactions have to occur at times interrup[t]s are disabled". So, the intention was 'disabled interrupts'. This matches the use cases for atomic I2C transfers I have seen so far: very late communication (mostly to a PMIC) to powerdown or reboot the system. For those cases, interrupts are disabled then. It doesn't seem that in_atomic() adds value. After a discussion with Peter Zijlstra[2], we came up with a better set of conditionals to match the use case. The I2C core will soon gain an extra callback into bus drivers especially for atomic transfers to make them more generic. The code deciding which transfer to use (atomic/non-atomic) should mimic the behaviour which locking to use (trylock/lock). This is why we add a helper for it. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/274695/ [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1067437/ Signed-off-by:Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Reviewed-by Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Tested-by:
Stefan Lengfeld <contact@stefanchrist.eu> Signed-off-by:
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE