+6
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
When parsing an ethtool flow spec to build a flow_rule, the code checks if both the vlan etype and the vlan tci are specified by the user to add a FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_VLAN match. However, when the user only specified a vlan etype or a vlan tci, this check silently ignores these parameters. For example, the following rule : ethtool -N eth0 flow-type udp4 vlan 0x0010 action -1 loc 0 will result in no error being issued, but the equivalent rule will be created and passed to the NIC driver : ethtool -N eth0 flow-type udp4 action -1 loc 0 In the end, neither the NIC driver using the rule nor the end user have a way to know that these keys were dropped along the way, or that incorrect parameters were entered. This kind of check should be left to either the driver, or the ethtool flow spec layer. This commit makes so that ethtool parameters are forwarded as-is to the NIC driver. Since none of the users of ethtool_rx_flow_rule_create are using the VLAN dissector, I don't think this qualifies as a regression. Fixes: eca4205f ("ethtool: add ethtool_rx_flow_spec to flow_rule structure translator") Signed-off-by:Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Acked-by:
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@gnumonks.org> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE