+3
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
... and produce consistent error on attempt to delete such. Existing check in u32_delete() is inconsistent - after tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1: u32 \ divisor 1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 200 handle 2: u32 \ divisor 1 both tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 801: u32 and tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 800: u32 will fail (at least with refcounting fixes), but the former will complain about an attempt to remove a busy table, while the latter will recognize it as root and yield "Not allowed to delete root node" instead. The problem with the existing check is that several tcf_proto instances might share the same tp->data and handle-to-hnode lookup will be the same for all of them. So comparing an hnode to be deleted with tp->root won't catch the case when one tp is used to try deleting the root of another. Solution is trivial - mark the root hnodes explicitly upon allocation and check for that. Signed-off-by:Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE