+2
−3
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Commit 6770b211 (ARM: OMAP2+: Export SoC information to userspace) had some broken return value handling as noted by Russell King: + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(soc_dev)) { + kfree(soc_dev_attr); + return; + } + + parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev); + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent)) + device_create_file(parent, &omap_soc_attr); This is nonsense. For the first, IS_ERR() is sufficient. For the second, tell me what error checking is required in the return value of this function: struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc_dev) { return &soc_dev->dev; } when you've already determined that the passed soc_dev is a valid pointer. If you read the comments against the prototype: /** * soc_device_to_device - helper function to fetch struct device * @soc: Previously registered SoC device container */ struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc); if "soc" is valid, it means the "previously registered SoC device container" must have succeeded and that can only happen if the struct device has been registered. Ergo, there will always be a valid struct device pointer for any registered SoC device container. Therefore, if soc_device_register() succeeds, then the return value from soc_device_to_device() will always be valid and no error checking of it is required. Simples. The rule as ever applies here: get to know the APIs your using and don't fumble around in the dark hoping that you'll get this stuff right. Fix it as noted by Russell. Reported-by:Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE