+22
−4
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Commit 55c8fc3f ("powerpc/8xx: reintroduce 16K pages with HW assistance") redefined pte_t as a struct of 4 pte_basic_t, because in 16K pages mode there are four identical entries in the page table. But hugepd entries for 8M pages require only one entry of size pte_basic_t. So there is no point in creating a cache for 4 entries page tables. Calculate PTE_T_ORDER using the size of pte_basic_t instead of pte_t. Define specific huge_pte helpers (set_huge_pte_at(), huge_pte_clear(), huge_ptep_set_wrprotect()) to write the pte in a single entry instead of using set_pte_at() which writes 4 identical entries in 16k pages mode. Also make sure that __ptep_set_access_flags() properly handle the huge_pte case. Define set_pte_filter() inline otherwise GCC doesn't inline it anymore because it is now used twice, and that gives a pretty suboptimal code because of pte_t being a struct of 4 entries. Those functions are also used for 512k pages which only require one entry as well allthough replicating it four times was harmless as 512k pages entries are spread every 128 bytes in the table. Signed-off-by:Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by:
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/43050d1a0c2d6e1541cab9c1126fc80bc7015ebd.1589866984.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE