+13
−3
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
In commit 221af7f8 ("Split 'flush_old_exec' into two functions"), the comment about the point of no return should have stayed in flush_old_exec() since it refers to "bprm->mm = NULL;" line, but prior changes in commits c89681ed ("remove steal_locks()"), and fd8328be ("sanitize handling of shared descriptor tables in failing execve()") made it look like it meant the current->sas_ss_sp line instead. The comment was referring to the fact that once bprm->mm is NULL, all failures from a binfmt load_binary hook (e.g. load_elf_binary), will get SEGV raised against current. Move this comment and expand the explanation a bit, putting it above the assignment this time, and add details about the true nature of "point of no return" being the call to flush_old_exec() itself. This also removes an erroneous commet about when credentials are being installed. That has its own dedicated function, install_exec_creds(), which carries a similar (and correct) comment, so remove the bogus comment where installation is not actually happening. Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by:Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by:
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Acked-by:
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE