Commit a167b1e1 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson
Browse files

drm/i915: Pull intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() under the spinlock



Elsewhere we manipulate uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check and
i915_param.mmio_debug under the irq lock (e.g. preserving the current
value across a user forcewake grab), but do not protect the manipulation
inside intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() from concurrent
access, even from itself. This is an issue as we do call
arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection from multiple threads without coordination.

Suggested-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intelcom>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904131207.17563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent b212f0a4
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2283,8 +2283,12 @@ bool intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
bool
intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
	bool ret = false;

	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);

	if (unlikely(dev_priv->uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check <= 0))
		return false;
		goto out;

	if (unlikely(intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))) {
		if (!i915_modparams.mmio_debug) {
@@ -2294,10 +2298,13 @@ intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
			i915_modparams.mmio_debug++;
		}
		dev_priv->uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check--;
		return true;
		ret = true;
	}

	return false;
out:
	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);

	return ret;
}

static enum forcewake_domains