+10
−0
+10
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Based on RFC3376 5.1 and RFC3810 6.1
If the per-interface listening change that triggers the new report is
a filter mode change, then the next [Robustness Variable] State
Change Reports will include a Filter Mode Change Record. This
applies even if any number of source list changes occur in that
period.
Old State New State State Change Record Sent
--------- --------- ------------------------
INCLUDE (A) EXCLUDE (B) TO_EX (B)
EXCLUDE (A) INCLUDE (B) TO_IN (B)
So we should not send source-list change if there is a filter-mode change.
Here are two scenarios:
1. Group deleted and filter mode is EXCLUDE, which means we need send a
TO_IN { }.
2. Not group deleted, but has pcm->crcount, which means we need send a
normal filter-mode-change.
At the same time, if the type is ALLOW or BLOCK, and have psf->sf_crcount,
we stop add records and decrease sf_crcount directly
Reference: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/magma/current/msg01274.html
Signed-off-by:
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Acked-by:
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE