+1
−1
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
The depth-first splitting is introduced in commit 18a25da8 ("dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first tree walk"), which is used to fix the potential deadlock in case of the misordering handling of bios caused by bio_list. There're two paths submitting split bios, dm_wq_work() from worker thread and submit_bio() from application. Back upon that time, dm_wq_work() thread calls __split_and_process_bio() directly and thus will not trigger this issue since bio_list doesn't exist here. So this issue will only be triggered from application calling submit_bio(), and the fix has to check if current->bio_list is non-NULL to distinguish this case. However since commit 0c2915b8 ("dm: fix missing imposition of queue_limits from dm_wq_work() thread"), dm_wq_work() thread calls submit_bio_noacct() and thus also uses bio_list. Since then all entries into __split_and_process_bio() are under protection of bio_list, and thus the checking of current->bio_list when determinning if the depth-first principle should be used, seems kind of nonsense. After all the checking always succeeds now. Fixes: 0c2915b8 ("dm: fix missing imposition of queue_limits from dm_wq_work() thread") Signed-off-by:Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE