+28
−43
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Process handling QSPI when transmit/receive at qspi_trigger_transfer_out_in() as follows: Setting the trigger, is the number of bytes in the FIFO buffer to determine when there is an interrupt. Then check if the value of triggering number is 32-bytes or 1-byte, there will be corresponding processing Handling (if (n == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) esle) this is unnecessary, leads to the same processing of data transmission or reception, The difference here are with ret = rspi_wait_for_tx_empty(rspi); ret = rspi_wait_for_rx_full(rspi); When the nummber trigger is 32 bytes, we only write into FIFO when the FIFO is completely empty (interrupt transmission), and only receive if FIFO is full of 32 bytes of data. In the case of a nummber trigger that is 1 byte, in principle we still need to process rspi_wait_for_tx_empty/full so that FIFO is empty only with the amount of data we need to write to or equal to the number of bytes we need to receive, There is currently no processing of this. And in the current case with this patch, at this time it only needs at least 1 byte received in FIFO that has interrupt received, or FIFO at least 1bytes free can be written into FIFO, This patch therefore does not affect this processing. So we need to eliminate unnecessary waste processing (if (n == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) esle), more precisely in waiting for FIFO status. The same with handling in qspi_transfer_out()/qspi_transfer_in(). Signed-off-by:Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@jinso.co.jp> Signed-off-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE