Commit 7b2c7b62 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner
Browse files

arm64/stacktrace: Remove the pointless ULONG_MAX marker



Terminating the last trace entry with ULONG_MAX is a completely pointless
exercise and none of the consumers can rely on it because it's
inconsistently implemented across architectures. In fact quite some of the
callers remove the entry and adjust stack_trace.nr_entries afterwards.

Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190410103644.220247845@linutronix.de
parent fa983399
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+0 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
#endif

	walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_trace, &data);
	if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_regs);

@@ -172,8 +170,6 @@ static noinline void __save_stack_trace(struct task_struct *tsk,
#endif

	walk_stackframe(tsk, &frame, save_trace, &data);
	if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
		trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;

	put_task_stack(tsk);
}