Commit 795ee49c authored by Pavel Begunkov's avatar Pavel Begunkov Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

block: optimise bvec_iter_advance()



bvec_iter_advance() is quite popular, but compilers fail to do proper
alias analysis and optimise it good enough. The assembly is checked
for gcc 9.2, x86-64.

- remove @iter->bi_size from min(...), as it's always less than @bytes.
Modify at the beginning and forget about it.

- the compiler isn't able to collapse memory dependencies and remove
writes in the loop. Help it by explicitely using local vars.

Signed-off-by: default avatarArvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 8cdda87a
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+10 −12
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -87,26 +87,24 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
		struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned bytes)
{
	unsigned int idx = iter->bi_idx;

	if (WARN_ONCE(bytes > iter->bi_size,
		     "Attempted to advance past end of bvec iter\n")) {
		iter->bi_size = 0;
		return false;
	}

	while (bytes) {
		const struct bio_vec *cur = bv + iter->bi_idx;
		unsigned len = min3(bytes, iter->bi_size,
				    cur->bv_len - iter->bi_bvec_done);

		bytes -= len;
		iter->bi_size -= len;
		iter->bi_bvec_done += len;
	iter->bi_size -= bytes;
	bytes += iter->bi_bvec_done;

		if (iter->bi_bvec_done == cur->bv_len) {
			iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
			iter->bi_idx++;
		}
	while (bytes && bytes >= bv[idx].bv_len) {
		bytes -= bv[idx].bv_len;
		idx++;
	}

	iter->bi_idx = idx;
	iter->bi_bvec_done = bytes;
	return true;
}