+44
−46
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Interestingly, the raid5 code can actually prevent double initialization and hence can use the following simplified form of callback registration: register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); put_online_cpus(); A hotplug operation that occurs between registering the notifier and calling get_online_cpus(), won't disrupt anything, because the code takes care to perform the memory allocations only once. So reorganize the code in raid5 this way to fix the deadlock with callback registration. Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v2.6.32+) Fixes: 36d1c647 Signed-off-by:Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [Srivatsa: Fixed the unregister_cpu_notifier() deadlock, added the free_scratch_buffer() helper to condense code further and wrote the changelog.] Signed-off-by:
Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE