+86
−26
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
In cases of short transfer times the CPU is spending lots of time in the interrupt handler and scheduler to reschedule the worker thread. Measurements show that we have times where it takes 29.32us to between the last clock change and the time that the worker-thread is running again returning from wait_for_completion_timeout(). During this time the interrupt-handler is running calling complete() and then also the scheduler is rescheduling the worker thread. This time can vary depending on how much of the code is still in CPU-caches, when there is a burst of spi transfers the subsequent delays are in the order of 25us, so the value of 30us seems reasonable. With polling the whole transfer of 4 bytes at 10MHz finishes after 6.16us (CS down to up) with the real transfer (clock running) taking 3.56us. So the efficiency has much improved and is also freeing CPU cycles, reducing interrupts and context switches. Because of the above 30us seems to be a reasonable limit for polling. Signed-off-by:Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org> Signed-off-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE