+16
−21
+10
−0
+30
−10
+2
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Calculating dquot CRCs when the backing buffer is written back just doesn't work reliably. There are several places which manipulate dquots directly in the buffers, and they don't calculate CRCs appropriately, nor do they always set the buffer up to calculate CRCs appropriately. Firstly, if we log a dquot buffer (e.g. during allocation) it gets logged without valid CRC, and so on recovery we end up with a dquot that is not valid. Secondly, if we recover/repair a dquot, we don't have a verifier attached to the buffer and hence CRCs are not calculated on the way down to disk. Thirdly, calculating the CRC after we've changed the contents means that if we re-read the dquot from the buffer, we cannot verify the contents of the dquot are valid, as the CRC is invalid. So, to avoid all the dquot CRC errors that are being detected by the read verifier, change to using the same model as for inodes. That is, dquot CRCs are calculated and written to the backing buffer at the time the dquot is flushed to the backing buffer. If we modify the dquot directly in the backing buffer, calculate the CRC immediately after the modification is complete. Hence the dquot in the on-disk buffer should always have a valid CRC. Signed-off-by:Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> Signed-off-by:
Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE