+18
−11
+18
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Back in commit 3b47d303 ("net: gro: add a per device gro flush timer") we added the ability to arm one high resolution timer, that we used to keep not-complete packets in GRO engine a bit longer, hoping that further frames might be added to them. Since then, we added the napi_complete_done() interface, and commit 364b6055 ("net: busy-poll: return busypolling status to drivers") allowed drivers to avoid re-arming NIC interrupts if we made a promise that their NAPI poll() handler would be called in the near future. This infrastructure can be leveraged, thanks to a new device parameter, which allows to arm the napi hrtimer, instead of re-arming the device hard IRQ. We have noticed that on some servers with 32 RX queues or more, the chit-chat between the NIC and the host caused by IRQ delivery and re-arming could hurt throughput by ~20% on 100Gbit NIC. In contrast, hrtimers are using local (percpu) resources and might have lower cost. The new tunable, named napi_defer_hard_irqs, is placed in the same hierarchy than gro_flush_timeout (/sys/class/net/ethX/) By default, both gro_flush_timeout and napi_defer_hard_irqs are zero. This patch does not change the prior behavior of gro_flush_timeout if used alone : NIC hard irqs should be rearmed as before. One concrete usage can be : echo 20000 >/sys/class/net/eth1/gro_flush_timeout echo 10 >/sys/class/net/eth1/napi_defer_hard_irqs If at least one packet is retired, then we will reset napi counter to 10 (napi_defer_hard_irqs), ensuring at least 10 periodic scans of the queue. On busy queues, this should avoid NIC hard IRQ, while before this patch IRQ avoidance was only possible if napi->poll() was exhausting its budget and not call napi_complete_done(). This feature also can be used to work around some non-optimal NIC irq coalescing strategies. Having the ability to insert XX usec delays between each napi->poll() can increase cache efficiency, since we increase batch sizes. It also keeps serving cpus not idle too long, reducing tail latencies. Co-developed-by:Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE