+7
−18
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
While running KernelThreadSanitizer (ktsan) on upstream kernel with trinity, we got a few reports from SyS_swapon, here is one of them: Read of size 8 by thread T307 (K7621): [< inlined >] SyS_swapon+0x3c0/0x1850 SYSC_swapon mm/swapfile.c:2395 [<ffffffff812242c0>] SyS_swapon+0x3c0/0x1850 mm/swapfile.c:2345 [<ffffffff81e97c8a>] ia32_do_call+0x1b/0x25 Looks like the swap_lock should be taken when iterating through the swap_info array on lines 2392 - 2401: q->swap_file may be reset to NULL by another thread before it is dereferenced for f_mapping. But why is that iteration needed at all? Doesn't the claim_swapfile() which follows do all that is needed to check for a duplicate entry - FMODE_EXCL on a bdev, testing IS_SWAPFILE under i_mutex on a regfile? Well, not quite: bd_may_claim() allows the same "holder" to claim the bdev again, so we do need to use a different holder than "sys_swapon"; and we should not replace appropriate -EBUSY by inappropriate -EINVAL. Index i was reused in a cpu loop further down: renamed cpu there. Reported-by:Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE