+19
−12
Loading
xfs: extent size hints can round up extents past MAXEXTLEN
This results in BMBT corruption, as seen by this test: # mkfs.xfs -f -d size=40051712b,agcount=4 /dev/vdc .... # mount /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch # xfs_io -ft -c "extsize 16m" -c "falloc 0 30g" -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/scratch/foo which results in this failure on a debug kernel: XFS: Assertion failed: (blockcount & xfs_mask64hi(64-BMBT_BLOCKCOUNT_BITLEN)) == 0, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c, line: 211 .... Call Trace: [<ffffffff814cf0ff>] xfs_bmbt_set_allf+0x8f/0x100 [<ffffffff814cf18d>] xfs_bmbt_set_all+0x1d/0x20 [<ffffffff814f2efe>] xfs_iext_insert+0x9e/0x120 [<ffffffff814c7956>] ? xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real+0x1c6/0xc70 [<ffffffff814c7956>] xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real+0x1c6/0xc70 [<ffffffff814caaab>] xfs_bmapi_write+0x72b/0xed0 [<ffffffff811c72ac>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x15c/0x170 [<ffffffff814fe070>] xfs_alloc_file_space+0x160/0x400 [<ffffffff81ddcc29>] ? down_write+0x29/0x60 [<ffffffff815063eb>] xfs_file_fallocate+0x29b/0x310 [<ffffffff811d2bc8>] ? __sb_start_write+0x58/0x120 [<ffffffff811e3e18>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570 [<ffffffff811cd680>] vfs_fallocate+0x140/0x260 [<ffffffff811ce6f8>] SyS_fallocate+0x48/0x80 [<ffffffff81ddec09>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 The tracepoint that indicates the extent that triggered the assert failure is: xfs_iext_insert: idx 0 offset 0 block 16777224 count 2097152 flag 1 Clearly indicating that the extent length is greater than MAXEXTLEN, which is 2097151. A prior trace point shows the allocation was an exact size match and that a length greater than MAXEXTLEN was asked for: xfs_alloc_size_done: agno 1 agbno 8 minlen 2097152 maxlen 2097152 ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ We don't see this problem with extent size hints through the IO path because we can't do single IOs large enough to trigger MAXEXTLEN allocation. fallocate(), OTOH, is not limited in it's allocation sizes and so needs help here. The issue is that the extent size hint alignment is rounding up the extent size past MAXEXTLEN, because xfs_bmapi_write() is not taking into account extent size hints when calculating the maximum extent length to allocate. xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() is already doing this, but direct extent allocation is not. Unfortunately, the calculation in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() is wrong, and it works only because delayed allocation extents are not limited in size to MAXEXTLEN in the in-core extent tree. hence this calculation does not work for direct allocation, and the delalloc code needs fixing. This may, in fact be the underlying bug that occassionally causes transaction overruns in delayed allocation extent conversion, so now we know it's wrong we should fix it, too. Many thanks to Brian Foster for finding this problem during review of this patch. Hence the fix, after much code reading, is to allow xfs_bmap_extsize_align() to align partial extents when full alignment would extend the alignment past MAXEXTLEN. We can safely do this because all callers have higher layer allocation loops that already handle short allocations, and so will simply run another allocation to cover the remainder of the requested allocation range that we ignored during alignment. The advantage of this approach is that it also removes the need for callers to do anything other than limit their requests to MAXEXTLEN - they don't really need to be aware of extent size hints at all. Signed-off-by:Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: