+8
−16
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
__GFP_THISNODE is documented to enforce the allocation to be satisified from the requested node with no fallbacks or placement policy enforcements. policy_zonelist seemingly breaks this semantic if the current policy is MPOL_MBIND and instead of taking the node it will fallback to the first node in the mask if the requested one is not in the mask. This is confusing to say the least because it fact we shouldn't ever go that path. First tasks shouldn't be scheduled on CPUs with nodes outside of their mempolicy binding. And secondly policy_zonelist is called only from 3 places: - huge_zonelist - never should do __GFP_THISNODE when going this path - alloc_pages_vma - which shouldn't depend on __GFP_THISNODE either - alloc_pages_current - which uses default_policy id __GFP_THISNODE is used So we shouldn't even need to care about this possibility and can drop the confusing code. Let's keep a WARN_ON_ONCE in place to catch potential users and fix them up properly (aka use a different allocation function which ignores mempolicy). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161013125958.32155-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by:Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE