+40
−2
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
The thin provisioning target maintains per thin device mappings that map virtual blocks to data blocks in the data device. When we write to a shared block, in case of internal snapshots, or provision a new block, in case of external snapshots, we copy the shared block to a new data block (COW), update the mapping for the relevant virtual block and then issue the write to the new data block. Suppose the data device has a volatile write-back cache and the following sequence of events occur: 1. We write to a shared block 2. A new data block is allocated 3. We copy the shared block to the new data block using kcopyd (COW) 4. We insert the new mapping for the virtual block in the btree for that thin device. 5. The commit timeout expires and we commit the metadata, that now includes the new mapping from step (4). 6. The system crashes and the data device's cache has not been flushed, meaning that the COWed data are lost. The next time we read that virtual block of the thin device we read it from the data block allocated in step (2), since the metadata have been successfully committed. The data are lost due to the crash, so we read garbage instead of the old, shared data. This has the following implications: 1. In case of writes to shared blocks, with size smaller than the pool's block size (which means we first copy the whole block and then issue the smaller write), we corrupt data that the user never touched. 2. In case of writes to shared blocks, with size equal to the device's logical block size, we fail to provide atomic sector writes. When the system recovers the user will read garbage from that sector instead of the old data or the new data. 3. Even for writes to shared blocks, with size equal to the pool's block size (overwrites), after the system recovers, the written sectors will contain garbage instead of a random mix of sectors containing either old data or new data, thus we fail again to provide atomic sectors writes. 4. Even when the user flushes the thin device, because we first commit the metadata and then pass down the flush, the same risk for corruption exists (if the system crashes after the metadata have been committed but before the flush is passed down to the data device.) The only case which is unaffected is that of writes with size equal to the pool's block size and with the FUA flag set. But, because FUA writes trigger metadata commits, this case can trigger the corruption indirectly. Moreover, apart from internal and external snapshots, the same issue exists for newly provisioned blocks, when block zeroing is enabled. After the system recovers the provisioned blocks might contain garbage instead of zeroes. To solve this and avoid the potential data corruption we flush the pool's data device **before** committing its metadata. This ensures that the data blocks of any newly inserted mappings are properly written to non-volatile storage and won't be lost in case of a crash. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:Nikos Tsironis <ntsironis@arrikto.com> Acked-by:
Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE