+16
−6
+9
−1
+4
−0
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Currently in when getting the block group number for a particular block in ext4_block_in_group() we're using ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() which uses do_div() to get the block group and the remainer which is offset within the group. We don't need all of that in ext4_block_in_group() as we only need to figure out the group number. This commit changes ext4_block_in_group() to calculate group number directly. This shows as a big improvement with regards to cpu utilization. Measuring fallocate -l 15T on fresh file system with perf showed that 23% of cpu time was spend in the ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(). With this change it completely disappears from the list only bumping the occurrence of ext4_init_block_bitmap() which is the biggest user of ext4_block_in_group() by 4%. As the result of this change on my system the fallocate call was approx. 10% faster. However since there is '-g' option in mkfs which allow us setting different groups size (mostly for developers) I've introduced new per file system flag whether we have a standard block group size or not. The flag is used to determine whether we can use the bit shift optimization or not. Signed-off-by:Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE