+35
−40
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
David noticed : ------------------ Eric, I was profiling the non-routing-cache case and something that stuck out is the case of calling inet_getpeer() with create==0. If an entry is not found, we have to redo the lookup under a spinlock to make certain that a concurrent writer rebalancing the tree does not "hide" an existing entry from us. This makes the case of a create==0 lookup for a not-present entry really expensive. It is on the order of 600 cpu cycles on my Niagara2. I added a hack to not do the relookup under the lock when create==0 and it now costs less than 300 cycles. This is now a pretty common operation with the way we handle COW'd metrics, so I think it's definitely worth optimizing. ----------------- One solution is to use a seqlock instead of a spinlock to protect struct inet_peer_base. After a failed avl tree lookup, we can easily detect if a writer did some changes during our lookup. Taking the lock and redo the lookup is only necessary in this case. Note: Add one private rcu_deref_locked() macro to place in one spot the access to spinlock included in seqlock. Signed-off-by:Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE