Commit 655c9141 authored by Mauro S. M. Rodrigues's avatar Mauro S. M. Rodrigues Committed by Jeff Kirsher
Browse files

ixgbe: Check DDM existence in transceiver before access



Some transceivers may comply with SFF-8472 but not implement the Digital
Diagnostic Monitoring (DDM) interface described in it. The existence of
such area is specified by bit 6 of byte 92, set to 1 if implemented.

Currently, due to not checking this bit ixgbe fails trying to read SFP
module's eeprom with the follow message:

ethtool -m enP51p1s0f0
Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Input/output error

Because it fails to read the additional 256 bytes in which it was assumed
to exist the DDM data.

This issue was noticed using a Mellanox Passive DAC PN 01FT738. The eeprom
data was confirmed by Mellanox as correct and present in other Passive
DACs in from other manufacturers.

Signed-off-by: default avatar"Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarAndrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
parent 3b525691
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3226,7 +3226,8 @@ static int ixgbe_get_module_info(struct net_device *dev,
		page_swap = true;
	}

	if (sff8472_rev == IXGBE_SFF_SFF_8472_UNSUP || page_swap) {
	if (sff8472_rev == IXGBE_SFF_SFF_8472_UNSUP || page_swap ||
	    !(addr_mode & IXGBE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED)) {
		/* We have a SFP, but it does not support SFF-8472 */
		modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
		modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
+1 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#define IXGBE_SFF_SOFT_RS_SELECT_10G		0x8
#define IXGBE_SFF_SOFT_RS_SELECT_1G		0x0
#define IXGBE_SFF_ADDRESSING_MODE		0x4
#define IXGBE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED		0x40
#define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_DA_ACTIVE_CABLE		0x1
#define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_DA_PASSIVE_CABLE		0x8
#define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_CONNECTOR_NOT_SEPARABLE	0x23