+174
−210
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
The hard coded inode numbers in proc currently limit its maintainability, its flexibility, and what can be done with the rest of system. /proc limits pid-max to 32768 on 32 bit systems it limits fd-max to 32768 on all systems, and placing the pid in the inode number really gets in the way of implementing subdirectories of per process information. Ever since people started adding to the middle of the file type enumeration we haven't been maintaing the historical inode numbers, all we have really succeeded in doing is keeping the pid in the proc inode number. The pid is already available in the directory name so no information is lost removing it from the inode number. So if something in user space cares if we remove the inode number from the /proc inode it is almost certainly broken. Signed-off-by:Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE