+12
−2
Loading
drm: Defer disabling the vblank IRQ until the next interrupt (for instant-off)
On vblank instant-off systems, we can get into a situation where the cost of enabling and disabling the vblank IRQ around a drmWaitVblank query dominates. And with the advent of even deeper hardware sleep state, touching registers becomes ever more expensive. However, we know that if the user wants the current vblank counter, they are also very likely to immediately queue a vblank wait and so we can keep the interrupt around and only turn it off if we have no further vblank requests queued within the interrupt interval. After vblank event delivery, this patch adds a shadow of one vblank where the interrupt is kept alive for the user to query and queue another vblank event. Similarly, if the user is using blocking drmWaitVblanks, the interrupt will be disabled on the IRQ following the wait completion. However, if the user is simply querying the current vblank counter and timestamp, the interrupt will be disabled after every IRQ and the user will enabled it again on the first query following the IRQ. v2: Mario Kleiner - After testing this, one more thing that would make sense is to move the disable block at the end of drm_handle_vblank() instead of at the top. Turns out that if high precision timestaming is disabled or doesn't work for some reason (as can be simulated by echo 0 > /sys/module/drm/parameters/timestamp_precision_usec), then with your delayed disable code at its current place, the vblank counter won't increment anymore at all for instant queries, ie. with your other "instant query" patches. Clients which repeatedly query the counter and wait for it to progress will simply hang, spinning in an endless query loop. There's that comment in vblank_disable_and_save: "* Skip this step if there isn't any high precision timestamp * available. In that case we can't account for this and just * hope for the best. */ With the disable happening after leading edge of vblank (== hw counter increment already happened) but before the vblank counter/timestamp handling in drm_handle_vblank, that step is needed to keep the counter progressing, so skipping it is bad. Now without high precision timestamping support, a kms driver must not set dev->vblank_disable_immediate = true, as this would cause problems for clients, so this shouldn't matter, but it would be good to still make this robust against a future kms driver which might have unreliable high precision timestamping, e.g., high precision timestamping that intermittently doesn't work. v3: Patch before coffee needs extra coffee. Testcase: igt/kms_vblank Signed-off-by:Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: