+14
−13
Loading
Gitlab 现已全面支持 git over ssh 与 git over https。通过 HTTPS 访问请配置带有 read_repository / write_repository 权限的 Personal access token。通过 SSH 端口访问请使用 22 端口或 13389 端口。如果使用CAS注册了账户但不知道密码,可以自行至设置中更改;如有其他问题,请发邮件至 service@cra.moe 寻求协助。
Along with the write access to the cgroup.procs or tasks file, cgroup
has required the writer's euid, unless root, to match [s]uid of the
target process or task. On cgroup v1, this is necessary because
there's nothing preventing a delegatee from pulling in tasks or
processes from all over the system.
If a user has a cgroup subdirectory delegated to it, the user would
have write access to the cgroup.procs or tasks file. If there are no
further checks than file write access check, the user would be able to
pull processes from all over the system into its subhierarchy which is
clearly not the intended behavior. The matching [s]uid requirement
partially prevents this problem by allowing a delegatee to pull in the
processes that belongs to it. This isn't a sufficient protection
however, because a user would still be able to jump processes across
two disjoint sub-hierarchies that has been delegated to them.
cgroup v2 resolves the issue by requiring the writer to have access to
the common ancestor of the cgroup.procs file of the source and target
cgroups. This confines each delegatee to their own sub-hierarchy
proper and bases all permission decisions on the cgroup filesystem
rather than having to pull in explicit uid matching.
cgroup v2 has still been applying the matching [s]uid requirement just
for historical reasons. On cgroup2, the requirement doesn't serve any
purpose while unnecessarily complicating the permission model. Let's
drop it.
Signed-off-by:
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CRA Git | Maintained and supported by SUSTech CRA and CCSE