+1
−1
Loading
block: __elv_next_request() shouldn't call into the elevator if bypassing
request_queue bypassing is used to suppress higher-level function of a request_queue so that they can be switched, reconfigured and shut down. A request_queue does the followings while bypassing. * bypasses elevator and io_cq association and queues requests directly to the FIFO dispatch queue. * bypasses block cgroup request_list lookup and always uses the root request_list. Once confirmed to be bypassing, specific elevator and block cgroup policy implementations can assume that nothing is in flight for them and perform various operations which would be dangerous otherwise. Such confirmation is acheived by short-circuiting all new requests directly to the dispatch queue and waiting for all the requests which were issued before to finish. Unfortunately, while the request allocating and draining sides were properly handled, we forgot to actually plug the request dispatch path. Even after bypassing mode is confirmed, if the attached driver tries to fetch a request and the dispatch queue is empty, __elv_next_request() would invoke the current elevator's elevator_dispatch_fn() callback. As all in-flight requests were drained, the elevator wouldn't contain any request but once bypass is confirmed we don't even know whether the elevator is even there. It might be in the process of being switched and half torn down. Frank Mayhar reports that this actually happened while switching elevators, leading to an oops. Let's fix it by making __elv_next_request() avoid invoking the elevator_dispatch_fn() callback if the queue is bypassing. It already avoids invoking the callback if the queue is dying. As a dying queue is guaranteed to be bypassing, we can simply replace blk_queue_dying() check with blk_queue_bypass(). Reported-by:Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> References: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1390319905.20232.38.camel@bobble.lax.corp.google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: